Recentemente anche la “rivale” TikTok, ha vietato l’uso dei filtri agli utenti minorenni sulla piattaforma. C’è qualcosa che non torna completamente con la decisione di Zuckerberg e i suoi collaboratori: si vuole rendere Instagram una piattaforma realmente naturale o ci sono anche (e soprattutto?) ragioni economiche che gravitano sulla questione? L'articolo Instagram toglie i filtri bellezza in realtà aumentata? Sì, ma non tutti: quelli di proprietà di Meta restano, e sono 140. Ecco come stanno le cose proviene da Il Fatto Quotidiano.
The main idea of the article is that Instagram is removing most third-party beauty filters in its augmented reality feature, but will keep the 140 filters owned by Meta.
The article questions the motivation behind this decision, wondering if Meta is truly trying to promote a more natural platform or if there are also economic reasons involved.
It also draws a comparison to TikTok, which has banned beauty filters for underage users, raising further questions about Instagram's intentions.
The main idea of the article is that Instagram is removing most third-party beauty filters in its augmented reality feature, but will keep the 140 filters owned by Meta. The article questions the motivation behind this decision, wondering if Meta is truly trying to promote a more natural platform or if there are also economic reasons involved. It also draws a comparison to TikTok, which has banned beauty filters for underage users, raising further questions about Instagram's intentions.
